One of the regular jobs that I quite enjoy doing is mucking out the goat shed. It may seem counterintuitive that this task, to shift a ton of goat manure mixed with straw from the shed to dung heap. is one that I don’t mind doing. But in all honesty, it has a lot going for it.
Firstly, the dung itself. Goat dung is formed in dry pellets and much easier to move than other dungs. Cow and pig dung is a lot wetter and harder to handle. It is also much less sticky and rolls rather than sticks so is again easier to move. Bird manure, especially duck, is terrible stuff – its adhesive properties would give superglue a run for its money. A final advantage is that it doesn’t stink. Many types of dung smell strongly, goat manure does not. There is a warm, goaty smell when working in the shed but it is not at all unpleasant.
Secondly, the job itself has a number of advantages. It is physical but not excessively so. On a cold day the work will keep you warm and on a wet day a large part of the task is done indoors so it can be better than other, wetter and colder, jobs around the smallholding. You know where you are when you ae shifting dung; the whole job is alike a visual progress bar, each square meter of concrete floor that becomes visible tells you how much you have done, and you can easily see how much more there is to do. If you are lucky to have young kids about, they can also “help” by jumping on your barrow or running across your path.
Although the work demands physical labour it is not mentally taxing and this, allied with the gentle environment, makes it ideal for listening to the radio or a podcase. A good drama can make this task fly by, but recently I have found the treasure trove of David Cayley’s programmes for the Ideas series he made for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation. These are excellent discussions and this time I had found one of the last interviews with the economist and philosopher Leopold Kohr. He had made this not long before his death. He was old and almost completely deaf by this time but his warmth and wit were still clearly evident. He is, rather than Schumacher, the author of the phrase “Small is beautiful” and it was interesting to hear how chance played such an important part in his life and to hear him describe his ideas on the importance of scale and size for human society.
One such lucky chance was that Gwynfor Evans, the leader of the Welsh Nationalist Plaid Cymru, party had read the excoriating review of Kohr’s book in the Observer. He felt that any book that an “English” newspaper hated this much must be worth reading and made contact with Kohr. This contact led to him being appointed to a Welsh University post, despite not speaking any Welsh, and living in Aberystwyth. Kohr and Schumacher’s ideas about the dangers of large-scale organisations has proven a valuable way to look at the nationalism of small countries such as Wales and Scotland. These ideas were important in their early political development. It is not a danger that these countries are too small to go it on their own, as is often proposed, it is precisely because they are small that they might succeed. Their smallness could help them become better places to live and trying to create better places to live is what should be at the heart of all political action.
When I lived in Scotland I latterly voted for the SNP and while in Wales I have looked to vote for Plaid Cymru. I have to admit that some of this was purely opportunistic. While in Scotland, I was looking for some way to avoid the rampant individualism of Thatcherism and hoped that a smaller independent Scotland might tack to kinder more communitarian values. Similarly in Wales, I hoped that drawing back power from a remote political bureaucracy would make it closer to the people and more responsive and engaging. I saw this as a way to reduce scale and, as a consequence, counter the ever increasing alienation of the populace from the government.
Unfortunately, it seems that many in Plaid Cymru and the SNP have not read, or have forgotten, Leopold Kohr’s work. Or possibly now many are just being opportunistic, like I was, but in a different manner. I fear many now vote for these parties as a way to undo the effects of Brexit. They see break away from the United Kingdom, not as a way to create small independent states, but as an escape route back into the bosom of the large European Union. This may suit those in these parties as they see it as an easily usable fault line in the British body politic, and those politicians will have as much, if not more, power in the European setting. It will not reduce things down to a more human scale, it will not promote more local cultures, and will not bring power closer to the citizen either geographically or in terms of accountability.
Listening to the podcast and realising that the UK nationalist parties have thrown away their Raison d’Être in the pursuit of power suddenly everything seemed to gel. Politics at the moment – It really is all a pile of manure!